🔗 Share this article

The decision from the Democratic National Committee to withhold the publication of its own autopsy report on the 2024 election appears remarkable but to be expected. Opposed to frank assessments, the party's leadership apparatus operates closer to a communications shop than an electoral entity committed to building grassroots capacities for winning elections.

An Environment That Avoids Dissent

Reluctant to depart from the party establishment's culture of conformity, the committee has stayed within that legacy throughout this past year. Publishing such a report could have demonstrated that party leaders truly desire to foster honest conversation regarding the missteps which allowed the former president to become president again. Instead, the committee is acting under the pretense that there are no lessons to be learned from the tragic debacle from the last cycle.

"Here’s our North Star: will this lead to victory? If the answer is no, it becomes a sideline issue from the core mission," a rationale reportedly given for withholding the report.

Major Failures an Autopsy Could Have Examined

An autopsy report with any value would confront key points of failure. Among them are:

• Electoral Disengagement: Failing to retain of a significant portion of the electorate who supported the party's candidate during the previous election was decisive in the close recent race.
• The Choice to Seek Re-election: The unwavering choice of the incumbent to run again, alongside an extremely delayed exit, is viewed as robbing the party's base the chance for open primaries.
• Losing Touch With the Working-Class Base: While facing economic anxiety, the campaign allegedly bowing to corporate donors' interests and not managing to address the effects of corporate greed.
• The Foreign Policy Effect: The failure to reconsider a stance regarding a major international conflict is cited as driving away significant blocs, particularly with youth voters, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• A Decline in Young Voter Support: Extensive evidence demonstrates a huge decline of Democratic support among voters aged 18-29.

A Record Shunning Scrutiny

The decision to withhold fits a pattern to avoid uncomfortable facts. This mirrors a situation in which virtually every Democratic officeholder in Washington supported an incumbent's insistence on seeking another term until a poor public debate performance forced a reversal.

Concurrently, large majorities of Democratic voters were consistently telling surveyors that they opposed that candidate to seek re-election.

Campaign Spending Issues

A substantive autopsy could probe questions about financial allocations, such as what sums were directed to insider consultants and ad buyers during a campaign that burned through a staggering sum in a short period.

The Broader Problem

At its core, the suppression surrounding this report highlights a submission to party leaders responsible for a disastrous national race. The message to the party's base – which includes countless dedicated activists – appears to be that they do not have a right to know what the leadership have learned from hundreds of interviews compiled from extensive interviews.

A party unable to honestly assess where it went wrong will struggle to break free from the cycle which was so beneficial to their opponents.